Return to the home page.

Go to copyright principles.

Check out the bibliography.

 

 

Critical Copyright, and more:

my essays, linked and glossed

 

You may redisseminate any of the following texts only in its entirety and without change and only if, in doing so, you name me as its author, you specify its title and publication information indicated below, and you give the address of this web page or link to it. For consent to disseminate any modified version, please contact me at the email address indicated on my résumé. Thank you! Paul Edward Geller

 

       Intellectual Property generally

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, Dissolving Intellectual Property, European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 28 (2006), p. 139

 

Why can’t we apply the law of intellectual property simply and coherently? This law seems to keep falling apart, while falling behind the information explosion that has kept accelerating over time. In the essay linked above, I trace this dynamic historically and outline new lines of research.

 

       Copyright and other rights in media productions

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, Copyright History and the Future: What's Culture Got to Do With It?, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, vol. 47 (2000), p. 209

 

With the advent of print in Europe, rising nation-states policed the book trade. Centuries later, authors began to be granted copyrights to control the publication and public performance of their works. Now, digital technologies are enabling end-users to rework and redisseminate works. In the essay linked above, I examine these trends and explore options for the future.

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, Toward an Overriding Norm in Copyright: Sign Wealth, Revue Internationale du Droit d'Auteur, no. 159 (1994), p. 3

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, Beyond the Copyright Crisis: Principles for Change, Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A., vol. 55 (2008), p. 165

 

What principles should guide copyright law? Check out the principles proposed elsewhere on this site. Distinct philosophical approaches have influenced these principles. In the first essay linked above, I critique how these approaches have been elaborated in the divergent regimes of copyright and of authors’ rights. In the second essay linked above, I try to resolve tensions both between and common to these regimes.

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, Hiroshige vs. Van Gogh: Resolving the Dilemma of Copyright Scope in Remedying Infringement, Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, vol. 46 (1998), p. 39

 

Take a look at Hiroshige’s prints and Van Gogh’s studies which reworked these prints. Should copyright law entitle an earlier creator, like Hiroshige, to stop a later creator, like Van Gogh, from transforming his work? Our response: No! the law should not obstruct creation, even that derived from another’s work, nor dissemination of such a creation. In the essay linked above, I explain legal and cultural considerations that compel and control this response. On that basis, I lay out guidelines for fashioning judicial remedies in copyright cases.

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, Legal Transplants in International Copyright: Some Questions of Method, UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, vol. 13 (1994), p. 199

 

·     Paul Edward Geller, Rethinking the Berne-Plus Framework: From Conflicts of Laws to Copyright Reform, European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 31 (2009), p. 391 

 

Copyright was born in Europe and has spread worldwide. In the first essay linked above, I analyze the conditions for transplanting laws, focusing on how treaties have globally harmonized copyright laws. In the second essay linked above, I explore how to rethink the treaty framework for coherently reforming diverse copyright laws worldwide.

 

       Patent and other rights in technologies and designs

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, An International Patent Utopia?, European Intellectual Property Review, vol. 25 (2003), p. 515

 

Swamped, the patent system is slowing down the feedback of new technologies into research and development. In the essay linked above, I propose a pair of new measures that, in tandem, might help to solve resulting problems. One measure would, via the internet, give global notice of innovative technologies; another would resolve disputes between claimants.

 

       Cyberlaw: governance within global networks

 

·    Paul Edward Geller, From Patchwork to Network: Strategies for International Intellectual Property in Flux, Duke Journal of International & Comparative Law, vol. 9 (1998), p. 69, and Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 31 (1998), p. 553

 

In the 1880s, treaties were concluded to assure the protection of intellectual property in many countries at once. The resulting system, much expanded but still operative today, governs a patchwork of territorial laws. In the essay linked above, I contemplate networking global governance in the field.

 

Return to the home page.

Go to copyright principles.

Check out the bibliography.