Return to the home page.

Check out my essays.

Go to copyright principles.

 

 

Critical Copyright, and more:

a short bibliography, with links

 

The following list arose out of the vagaries of my reading. Since this list is far from exhaustive, I urge you to pursue further research elsewhere, for example, as you explore ideas and references in works linked below. Please contact the author of any of these works for any consent you need that has not already been granted the public. Paul Edward Geller

 

       Intellectual Property generally

·       Jonathan M. Barnett, Is Intellectual Property Trivial?, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 157 (2009), p. 1691

·       James Boyle, A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism for the Net?, Duke Law Journal, vol. 47 (1997), p. 87

·       Paul A. David and Dominique Foray, Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society, Policy Futures in Education, vol. 1 (2003), p. 20

·       Simon Glezos, Creative Destruction versus Restrictive Practices, in Code Drift: Essays in Critical Digital Studies, eds. Arthur and Marilouise Kroker (May 20, 2010), at CTheory.net, cds004

·       Wendy J. Gordon, Of Harms and Benefits: Torts, Restitution, and Intellectual Property, Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 21 (1992), p. 449, reprinted in McGeorge Law Review, vol. 34 (2003), p. 541

·       Mark A. Lemley, Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding, Texas Law Review, vol. 83 (2005), p. 1031

·       Ejan Mackaay, Intellectual Property and the Internet: The Share of Sharing, in The Commodification of Information, eds. N. Netanel and N. Elkin-Koren (Kluwer, 2002), p. 133

·       Jerome H. Reichman, Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms, Columbia Law Review, vol. 94 (1994), p. 2432

·       Pamela Samuelson, Enriching Discourse on Public Domains, Duke Law Journal, vol. 55 (2006), p. 783

·       Tim Wu, Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions, Virginia Law Review, vol. 92 (2006), p. 123

       Copyright and other rights in media productions

·       Tom W. Bell, Escape from Copyright: Market Success vs. Statutory Failure in the Protection of Expressive Works, University of Cincinnati Law Review, vol. 69 (2001), p. 741

·       Peter Biddle, Paul England, Marcus Peinado, and Bryan Willman, The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution, in Digital Rights Management Workshop 2002, ed. J. Feigenbaum (Springer, 2003), p. 155

·       Julie E. Cohen, Pervasively Distributed Copyright Enforcement, Georgetown Law Journal, vol. 95 (2006), p. 1

·       Harold Demsetz, Creativity and the Economics of the Copyright Controversy, Review of Economic Research on Copyright Issues, vol. 6(2) (2009), p. 5

·       Brett M. Frischmann, Evaluating the Demsetzian Trend in Copyright Law, Review of Law and Economics, vol. 3(3) (2007), article 2

·       Justin Hughes, Fair Use Across Time, UCLA Law Review, vol. 50 (2003), p. 775

·       Dan Hunter and F. Gregory Lastowka, Amateur-to-Amateur, William & Mary Law Review, vol. 46 (2004), p. 951

·       Eben Moglen, Anarchism Triumphant: Free Software and the Death of Copyright, First Monday, vol. 4, no. 8 (August 2, 1999)

·       Alexander Peukert, A Bipolar Copyright System for the Digital Network Environment, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 28 (2005), p. 1

·       Jed Rubenfeld, The Freedom of Imagination: Copyright’s Constitutionality, Yale Law Journal, vol. 112 (2002), p. 1

       Patent and other rights in technologies and designs

·       Oren Bar-Gill and Gideon Parchomovsky, The Value of Giving Away Secrets, Virginia Law Review, vol. 89 (2003), p. 1857

·       Kevin Emerson Collins, Propertizing Thought, Southern Methodist University Law Review, vol. 60 (2007), p. 317

·       Clarisa Long, Patent Signals, University of Chicago Law Review, vol. 69 (2002), p. 625

·       Beth Simone Noveck, Peer To Patent”: Collective Intelligence, Open Review and Patent Reform, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, vol. 20 (2006), p. 123

·       Rudolph J.R. Peritz, Freedom to Experiment: Toward a Concept of Inventor Welfare, Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, vol. 90 (2008), p. 245

·       Jerome H. Reichman, Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation, Vanderbilt Law Review, vol. 53 (2000), p. 1743

·       Carl Shapiro, Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting, in Innovation Policy and the Economy, eds. A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, and S. Scott (MIT Press, 2001), vol. 1, p. 119

       Cyberlaw: governance within global networks

·       Yochai Benkler, Coase's Penguin, or, Linux and The Nature of the Firm, Yale Law Journal, vol. 112 (2002), p. 369

·       Egbert Dommering, Regulating technology: Code is not law, in Coding Regulation: Essays on the Normative Role of Information Technology, eds. E.J. Dommering and L.F. Asscher (T.M.C. Asser Press, 2006), p. 1

·       A. Michael Froomkin, Habermas@discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace, Harvard Law Review, vol. 116 (2003), p. 749

·       Joel R. Reidenberg, Technology and Internet Jurisdiction, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, vol. 153 (2005), p. 1951

·       Lawrence Solum and Minn Chung, The Layers Principle: Internet Architecture and the Law, Notre Dame Law Review, vol. 79 (2004), p. 815

 

Return to the home page.

Check out my essays.

Go to copyright principles.